He helped contribute to the outcome because he didn't notice the Reimu, but it doesn't change the fact that the Reimu is the one that started shitting in the food.
Creticus said: He helped contribute to the outcome because he didn't notice the Reimu, but it doesn't change the fact that the Reimu is the one that started shitting in the food.
Yeah, but yukkuri are dumb as shit and it's like blaming your dog for eating chocolate if you drop it.
It's an owner's responsibility to make sure these things don't happen under reasonable circumstances.
JusticeItEasy said: Anon should had realized something as obvious as a yu on his pocket, but the Reimu sure asked for that sure kill headbutt.
Perhaps on sentiment, but it was also a great excuse to fire him, considering he splatted the woman all over with food.
Hm, you have a good point. It's hard to determine the exact intelligence of yukkuri, but it's hard to assign blame to something on the level of a dog. I think it can still be argued that it contributed to the outcome, but that isn't the same as actually assigning responsibility to the yukkuri.
That said, given how in-tune dogs are to humans, I get the feeling that dogs are probably easier to train than the average yukkuri, even if humans and yukkuri are mutually intelligible.
I mean, sure, this Reimu's a little shit and deserved punishment, but how did he not notice a yukkuri in his front pocket?
Yeah, it defies credibility that he was unaware of a yukkuri in his breast pocket. If he wasn't carrying it on purpose (for what possible reason?), he must be some kind of idiot.