i kinda missed this senseless beating. other series keep showing why anons have to punish yukkuris; being reasonable they say. hurray cartoon violence!
I hate to see that there still made things like this. Anon gets jealous of an easy and happy yukkury family (that even sings so well to have spectators give them an applause), follows them to an alley to beat them to death (I would love to see what would happened if he trys this in front of the previous crowd) and takes their money away: a genuine coward bastard. This makes me RAGE against that anon instead of the yukkuris, when it should be the other way around.
It's a normal reaction of anyone, either person, animal or Yukkuri, to defend itself if it is being abused or beaten, despite of the outcome. @weser: If I beat you to death, would you stay idly until I reduced you to a bloody pulp?
@yakultrain: I'm not sure where that accusation comes from. From the comment I just made, would you not instead come to the conclusion I would do terrible things to the type of person you mention?
@weser what's wrong for self-defense against a coward like that? He got fine arms and legs, he could've look for a job instead robbing Yukkuris, especially these really easy Yukkuris.
The anon of this comic must be tortured and killed in the same way he killed the Yukkuris: his hair must be torn away, must be kicked in the face until he does not look like a human and his body must be cut from waist down as the grace shot. Of course, he must be allowed to throw some punches, kicks and bites, just to break his arms, legs and mouth after that.
Actually, the anon just wanted their money. If the mother didn't bump into him in post #12366 and the Komarisa didn't bite in post #12372 he'd let them go.
And as you see in post #12371 the mother realizes that. So bumping into him she wasn't defending her family. Quite the opposite, she was risking everything to protect their 5$.
Of course, the anon's still bad, he should probably be put on probation and get a couple hours community service, but don't make him a bigger monster than he is.
at last , someone came and sent the rest of this yukkuri family to dead(LOL) this guy didn't want to kill any of them at first. he just want to rob , but they fight back. so, he get enraged and kill them all. yes , he dare to do this (no one see or track him down , no law's punishment for killing stray animal , etc...)
I don't like some story that try to tell that had nothing can save a good people , but better has nothing to read. In fact , if you think you are a good people who will make a worthy thing to the world in future... you better surrender a valuable stuff to a robber , do not risk your life in critical situation(they has a weapon , you had no way to ran , and you will not end up by only got bruised , etc...)
Because of hundred of thoughtless punk can be reborn "very easy"(accidentally kill one of them and you will spent many years in jail...) Law can avenge your death(if you fail) , but still can not bring back your life , basically...don't pick a deficits fight.
^^ If the anon just took the money they probably won't have fought back (post #12371), the problem is that he also took the money 'bag' that happened to be the little Marisa's hat. If you look at the translation in post #12366 the children were crying for the hat and the mother bumped into him to stop him bullying the little ones.
Remember that the lose of the hat can be worse than death for yukkuris, so by taking it along the money the anon was pushing them into a fight or die situation.
Oh wow, shitty moralizing. I missed it just like I missed tasty, glorious, pointless violence towards an innocent, happy yukkuri family. :3 This series is indeed full of win. Is this made by KaiyuAki, by any chance? Art style is rather similar.
What I want to know is when Yukkuri became the poser child for Women Against Rape? I'm tempted to call you guys moral fags, but really you're worse than that. Just because someone drew a picture of a fake person that winds up killing fake balls of food, you launch insults against the fake and even the real person who drew it, just because of the demise of the ball of food.
Why? Is your sense of justice so horrible out of tune that you're willing to kill a real human being just because he drew someone smashing cutely decorated pieces of food? I think you guys here are the true scum for letting such this become so disproportionate.
@KZ Anon: Honestly, I don't see the other users talking about killing the author anywhere. Could you point it out? All I see is talking about killing the anon (Myself, I find him to be an unlikeable character, but I don't believe he deserves anything worse than a hard beating from another character).
Man, where did you get the idea of killing real humans or the one who drew? Because no-one have said that (well, pgraphics mentioned about killing someone real, but that was just an example, and Pity has spoken about the futility of getting killed by defending against a robber, which is out of your point).
And about the fact that all this came from drawings and yukkuris are not real, if you can get any emotion from drawings because they are drawings or have any opinion of fictional stories because they are fiction, well, what are you doing in a image board like this?
So, speaking of disproportionate answers... you get the point.
I could have sworn I saw someone mention "doing something to the anon that drew this."
Even still, I hate it when people mention that they want to kill or main a human just because he beat up a bunch of yukkuri. People continue to draw similarities between pieces of Bean wrapped in a flour dough to something that actually has a life of it's own, like a baby or a cat.
What's more is that these problems do exist in real life (Abusing, Robbing, etc.) And I really would like to see the same people that say they want to kill the Anon in the story go out and find people who actually are commiting these crimes on other real people. If you saw another person getting beaten up by someone, would you really go in and fight down that guy? Would you if they were beating up a yukkuri, instead?
God/Allah/Buddha/Raptor Jesus/The Flying Spaghetti Monster/Whatever deity you believe in only knows I'd love to reenact the toaster scene from Suicide Kings with an abusive parent/relative/caregiver.
I'd be more worried about the legal liabilities if I actually managed to injure them than getting my ass kicked, though. If I were to go to any prison I'd eventually leave looking like the Goatse man.
The problem is anthropomorphization and personalization. Yukkuri are, out of context, just animated manju; innately, no narrative. When they are inserted into a story, then there is context and, rather than just being "animated manju," they are filling some role in a story and we get the option of treating them as though they were that role depending on how accurately we accept their acting.
In this story, if the human is a human, it isn't possible to assume the yukkuri are to be treated as animals. If it were a "dog," for example, it would only make sense that it would be given something that a dog would like by the crowd. That makes the attack by the human who wanted "something a dog would like" odd. Food could make the situation make sense if the certified human is the hobo, and I'd still side with the dog over the hobo any day. That's neither here nor there. From a certain perspective, it doesn't matter what we consider the yukkuri.
My point is that we are forced to take this comic at the level of its actors' depicted roles: relatively innocent beggar and mugger, i.e., a street robbery that escalated to homicide. The only people for whom this thought doesn't cross their mind and get a powerful negative reaction are those who have discarded the narrative in exchange for senseless violence; and, that deprives the images of meaning.
You may as well just cut the pages up and distribute individual frames.
Except, I never got that thought as someone who is "in it for the senseless violence". There are multiple layers to roles than just "Innocent Begger" and "Mugger." Whether they're Yukkuri or Human, or an Animal also plays a part in how people feel about the role.
I became attached to Yukkuris because, in short, they are the internet's stressball. It's basic human nature to want to take out frustrations on somebody else, and the Yukkuri are the perfect replacement for human targets, especially considering there's no moral implications behind it.
This is why it's frustrating for me to see people attempt to place moral implications in favor of Yukkuri. It's an attempt at ruining a person's personal enjoyment.
You're right in that these stories might as well not exist for the people who enjoy the senseless violence. The only reason I see for having these stories is to justify the senseless violence. Half of the comics that pop up where an Anon abuses a yukkuri family, it always has to start with the Yukkuri yelling at the Anon. At least, that's what I see every time this discussion pops up.
"People continue to draw similarities between pieces of Bean wrapped in a flour dough to something that actually has a life of it's own, like a baby or a cat." God, I love this chestnut. So, let's walk through the logic. Yukkuri are composed of edible matter. Food is composed of edible matter. Food is insentient. Therefore yukkuri, and in fact every single carbon based life form known to science, are not sentient, because they are composed of edible material. It's a cop-out almost glorious in its multi-level incoherence.
Necessary disclaimer: That's not to say I hate yukkuri violence. I just hate it when people try to defend it because they can't bear to acknowledge their own sadistic streaks for as creepy and deviant as they are. The ego-protection is just risible - which is part of why I'm surprised KZ Anon is trotting out the "they're food" excuse, because the "stress ball" analogy really sums up all one needs to.
enough about yukkuri-moral discuss back to story in post #12366 I think mother reimu take out hidden-in-ribbon 10k yen to bribe mister to stop hurt them. which remarkable clever but little marisa destroy every thing by bite mister so THE END.
So, one can incriminate yukkuris in this story only one thing: stupidity.
Mother Reimu should've tried to get away by exchanging money for marisa's hat from the very beginning. But as a yukkuri she is stupid (maybe not as stupid as the most yukkuris are, but still stupid enough) and she doesn't realize how easily and quick human can crush yukkuris. Even without direct experience, cats and dogs are able to tell that from size comparison.
So, stupidity. And being stress-balls. That's the reasons here. But this anon is motherfucker despite that.
somehow the story is familair 1989 around kyoto ther was a womman with 2 childern a boy and a girl who lived on the street becaus her husband died and she had no family left too go back however she had a beautiful voice and so got some monney from peopel too at last mange too get some food for herself and her children one day a stranger followed them and tried too rob them but the boy who was carrying the money bag was holding it so strong that the stranger strugeled and fell over with him after that the stranger did beat up the family and already had broken some rips and a arm of that boy then the mother tried too give all the money she owned just too let them her children go but but the stranger kicked her in the face and was laugthing about them her bing worthless while kicking the boy agein the boy roled over on is stomache and bit the stranger in his leg after that the stranger stomped multibel times on his necktill some terrefic crack was too hear (the spin of the boy broke) after that police sound was abel too hear and the stranger run away the boy was instand death and the mother died on later in the hospital her girl suivved but she got a smash so have ony her head that one of her eyes got blind
a 80 year old man had called the police he was watching all but was too much in fear too do something else because the stranger was so brutal for the intrestet the total amount of money the womman had wasnt more then like 14$ (covertet from yen in dolar)
sometime, I don't understand some people here. They say noting or ever interest in torture and killing for fun post #3732 but complain with killing for money.
For me yukkuri is something that you kill it when you like to. I really like to have some of this post #12025
As FJH said. As long as nothing was said about yukkuris, they are just your plain average yukkuris - kill for fun, it's free. When some actions where done or declared by them, we start judging them by this actions. Who knows, maybe yesterday this yukkuris stole something, or even killed a pet. But as long,as this actions weren't done or declared in comic, they don't exist. So, in post #3732 we see just your average Marisa. And here we see good-natured, somewhat talented singers.
That's the first thing. Second is Anon. In post #3732 it's evil genius, and here is just a stupid backstreet bully. First one is to be respected. Second one not.
>>It's an attempt at ruining a person's personal enjoyment. That's called "troll-ing", and I doubt that is the intent of the users you accuse this of. >>Hey This, did you know they're quoting you? It sadly isn't the first time this has happened. Now, the fact that ONLY I was quoted sets a scary tone.
See it for what it is, an abomination. Kill it. If you want to liken it to some human, you can also liken it to a giant singing sewer rat.
If he kills some bee for stinging him because he fucked with the hive, would you say he got what he deserve or would you rage for the bees and promise him more pain?
and I just post what I want to say. I know now that you just don't want to hear something , or even a little of them that can be involved about a morality. so next time , I will be more careful about it.
I like this story i don't really think it's the anon's intend to took it's hat so i think if they just sit back he will let them go and give back the hat even some tugs won't harm you as long as he get the money he want, and in most cases he won't even took your wallet along with the money IF your wallet has no real value like that hat but on the other side since they don't seem to worry even a little bit about losing the money what they do is pure stupidity
I really don't understand the debate in general. Perhaps yukkuri are not just food, not just a few pixels, nor akin to babies or puppies. Maybe they're an extensive fanon based on as many opinions as fans. And maybe, just maybe, people aren't sadists or tree-huggers for approaching in their own way. I think the only problem with human nature apparent in yukkuri fandom is our tendency to find connections, even if they don't exist.
^ However, that is the concern. The primary debate is substance over story. There's no question that the violence was the core reason of the story but is "they're yukkuri so it's fine" an adequate reason to cheer for the unrepentant mugger? how does this response morph as the story loses it's human versus yukkuri mechanics and instead just becomes that - a story with nondescript individuals playing out the same roles? If this were a narrative where the yukkuri could be treated a delusion of the Mister, or a metaphor, then it wouldn't be a problem; this one hits too close to home because it plays the situation straight.
Take, for example, Goldilocks and the Three Bears. The earliest variants of the story that can be traced all have different sets of circumstances for "Goldilocks" - who was, at one point, a very degenerate "old crone," and at other parts merely a sly old woman, but not explained with much sympathy - but the essential story is still there. The story details an intrusion into another person's domicile, by our accounts "breaking and entering." You have the part that I hate the most: our Goldilocks suffers no consequences but fright for her actions - earlier variants had the old woman trying to be burnt or attempted to be impaled atop a church steeple - and she attributes the whole event to a thinly-veiled, cop-out moral.
Oh, how our perception of the story changes as the characters go from being a designated target to "must be treated with sympathy!" As far as I am concerned, this story is still just this story, because the identity of the characters do not add anything to it.
My criticism wasn't directed at the story or the debate about it specifically; it was more a blanket for this eternal debate over the identity of yukkuri. This may not be the best example to go by, since the species does seem irrelevant (after all, it seems the title is "Yukkuri Family and Human Scum", as well as it potentially being an allegory as per Wizzard2's post). The debate was good until people started saying "Imagine yukkuri is this!" "No, yukkuri is that!" I chose this image because of the presence of the debate and relative novelty. Sorry it wasn't clear: I'd be better off addressing specific messages.
Being the weak, unintelligent internet tough guy scum you are, you love the stories where Anons torture and kill the yukkuri for shits and giggles or for very little wrong-doing, commenting it "HURRR SCUM GOT WHAT IT DESERVED FOR FUCKING WITH THE SUPERIOR BEING". That is absolutely okay, your choice of entertainment.
But holy shit, I love the way you try to justify and rationalize it, denying you are just pitiful sick fucks with inferiority complexes. "HURRR YUKKURI FOOD" - yes, we totally aren't made of flesh, retards. A being that is capable of rational thinking, let alone speaking, is intelligent. They are childish, stupid and somewhat egocentric, but fuck you, children can be pretty much the same.
I love the comments in stories where a yukkuri acts high and mighty and then bumps into a human, resulting in ten-pages-long torture and murder - "HURR, the yukkuri deserved it!" - "DURR, yeah, I would totally kill it if it called me an idiot!", enjoying the screams and begging of the yukkuri (because if it doesn't cry and beg, it's not fun, amirite, sick fucks?) Yeah, if a child laughs at you and kicks you in the shank, you will totally gut it, smash its head and break its limbs. You are fucking trying to say that if an almost completely harmless being insults you and tries to attack you, looking rather pitiable, it's absolutely okay to kill it in a horrible way.
So, am I trying to say you can't enjoy it? FUCK NO! But don't deny you are a sick scum who jizzes his pants imagining a torture of a crying bag of uselessness, bathing in its pain and fear, enjoying how SUPERIOR you are.
I've seen it before somewhere - oh, I remember! "Jews / niggers / gooks / infidels are inferior scum, they don't deserve to live, every single wrongdoing does give me the right to kill them. And yeah, it's not wrong if I throw away my humanity and torture them, rape them, enjoy their pain, murder their families in front of them and enjoy the suffering, yes, it's totally okay, because they aren't like me!"
God, fap to it, read it all day and squeal and drool all over it, but DON'T fucking try to say it's okay just to appease your hypocritical insecure faggot self.
Side note, in the future, I don't know if I'll be able to post it here due to the lack of yukkuri, but me and an artist who I'm on good terms with... We'll be making sure this particular anon gets JUSTICE'd.
Poweryoga: I am able to separate fantasy from reality. But the way you justify your sick circlejerking faggotry does tell something about your real personalities, not about the way you want to look on the internet, smartass.
And yet, interestingly enough, in a time where consumption of pornography and violent media are at an all time high; their corresponsing "real life" counterparts have fallen over the last decade. What could possibly explain that? Clearly something must be wrong in the world, because obviously talking/drawing/writing about things make people want to do them in real life, and yet that doesn't seem to be happening...
Oh, and there's no reason the guy can't get JUSTICE'd by yukkuris; although I'm not sure how you'd get anon into a situation to face a dos, Utsuho, Medicine, Suika, Rumia (have anon remove its ribbon...), Mima, Keine, or Yukari.
Apparently you can't, hypocrite. Read your own brainless posts and learn a bit about your own personality. What comes out of my ass makes a better person than you ever can hope to be.
Poweryoga: Oh, I can almost smell that awesome butthurt. Before you start calling me hypocrite and ITG, please, at least fucking READ what it means. I sometimes enjoy yukkuri torture. But I at least have enough pride to admit IT DOES make me a sick fuck. I don't conveniently act like it's perfectly okay just to appease my little whiny self. I don't deny that it's fucked up like some retards here do, justifying it with 14-y/o reasoning and wannabe-logic that makes me to hit their faces with a sledgehammer.
The irony of this situation: Most people were initially objecting and saying they didn't like this kind of random violence. It temporarily turned into a discussion on how to punish Yukkuris for bad behaviour, and then one or two people came in and called them moralfags. Shit then flew.
But yes. One thing I do find annoying is when people come in and say LOL THEY DESERVE IT in situations where they don't. Doesn't mean that they can't enjoy it, though. And doesn't mean other people can't object to it, either.
A question related to this image archive: shii, would it be ok to upload images with violence against humasn (ie. anons getting abused by yukkuris). I think there isn't anything like that yet, although with all the non-human violence or sex we have already I don't believe it would be a problem I just to check in case you don't want it, like yu-cat Yuka story ending in other boards.
>48 comments this morning >65 comments now Goddammit OYP, this is the billionth time we've had this conversation. Justy, you aren't as charming as I. poweryoga, you arn't as endearing as SUN. Neither of you carry sound arguments, so the sooner you close this topic the better. As Shii has said, we don't need this shit cluttering up the comments page.
I still think that no one has really done a good job of messing up the shit by showing the lack of instrumentality by using Yukkuri's pain as an instrument of pleasure.