If I'm interpreting this series correctly: Alice rapes a Reimu to death, gets beaten by anon (I'm assuming he's Reimu's owner), then adopts the one koyukkuri that survives. Anon waits until Reimu grows up and then trolls Alice by killing it and then her.
Yes, Reimu is anon's pet. he raised her since she was a baby. Anon told Alice to raise koreimu.
A year later now that Alice grows attracted to her kid, Anon asks Alice if she remember what she did to his Reimu. Alice apologizes, Anon killed Reimu and says he did the same thing Alice did to him.
However, what the Anon did was in spite and intentional. What the Alice did was a combination of instinct and whatever counts as hormones to yukkuri. Justified, as yukkuri understand psychological pain in and of itself only, so the fallacy is somewhat ignorable.
But the Alice also apologized? earnestly? we're talking about creatures who tend not to lack objective introspection. If the Alice honestly displayed applied regret, then isn't the rest counter intuitive?
>>we're talking about creatures who tend not to lack objective introspection.
Is this a typo? Yukkuris severely lack objective introspection, or any type of introspection for that matter.
>>Justified, as yukkuri understand psychological pain in and of itself only
Yukkuris only understand physiological pain, as in only physical "ID HURDZ!!" They have no awareness of psychological processes.
You're trying to apply psychology to yukkuris but when will you understand that perhaps the artist didn't apply as much thought as you did? Artists and writers goof up all the time, and these are amateurs after all. Don't expect consistency in disorganized fan works.
That was two typos, yeah. Get rid of the "not," and I should have gone with "... understand psychological pain only for as far as it is pain and [hurdz] them, ..." Killing another (easy) yukkuri bothers them, for example, but their response rarely goes to being able to understand or justify "why you do this."