Adding to the Wiki

platina said:
Tell people to keep using braids for everything (in addition to using hair_use, flapping, or braid_loss when applicable)? Or change it so we only use braids if the picture has braids of interest that are NOT flapping, hair use, or braid_loss?

I think the latter should work.

platina said:
(I forgot all about the braid_loss tag until just now. Gonna go add it to post #42417. Although really, that looks more like it's gonna be a braid_victory.)

braid_win? Or my favorite, braid_abuser, to go with accessory_abuser.

Skribulous said:
Looks fine. There's an existing flapping tag, though.

Well the one you're pointing to doesn't seem to be in uses at the moment. We can either combine them or replace the one not in use with the one in use.

platina said:
I like it, but what are we going to do about the braids Wiki entry now that there are other tags with overlapping definitions?

I keep thinking of braids to be used in some different fashion every time it's brought up. I had a feeling my wiki definition may be in conflict with that specific entry, but at the time I couldn't find a solution towards making braids different from the others.

platina said:
Tell people to keep using braids for everything (in addition to using hair_use, flapping, or braid_loss when applicable)?

From my experience being on Danbooru related site I find this to be the most reasonable thing to do. Danbooru generally does this towards similar situations so the same could be said for this one. All four aren't mutually exclusive from one other.

platina said:
Or change it so we only use braids if the picture has braids of interest that are NOT flapping, hair use, or braid_loss?

Depends if post like these few cases count as cases where their braids are neither flapping, hair_use, or braid_loss are applicable and/or wouldn't describe them the best?

Gothic_Togekiss said:

Depends if post like these few cases count as cases where their braids are neither flapping, hair_use, or braid_loss are applicable and/or wouldn't describe them the best?

http://danbooru.donmai.us/post/show/493738/
http://yukkuri.shii.org/post/show/35537/
Aren't these chigaunsuyo?

http://yukkuri.shii.org/post/show/5695
Would this be braid_abuse (a subset of accessory_abuse)?

In attempts to adding a wiki description towards plugged_up I came up with this

When a yukkuri's anyaru and/or mamumamu is blocked by something, preventing the yukkuri from peeing or pooping. It could be the following:

• Sealed up by some sort of adhesive (i.e glue, tape)
  Covered by something which isn't easily removable when leave to their own devices (i.e a wet leaf, gravel)
  An item(s) is physically inserted into these orifices. (i.e a golf tee, sticks)
  The orifices are physically altered themselves (i.e using a soldering iron to seal the openings shut)

Not sure if this enough to describe the tag enough should I go into more depth on the subject. Any thoughts on it?

Gothic_Togekiss said:

Not sure if this enough to describe the tag enough should I go into more depth on the subject. Any thoughts on it?

It looks okay for me.

Anyway, about this: http://yukkuri.shii.org/wiki/show?title=unknown_20

Why?

How many times does the family_friendly and abuse tag have to be edited and expanded until commenters stop being yukkuri paste-brained shitheads?

Skribulous said:
How many times does the family_friendly and abuse tag have to be edited and expanded until commenters stop being yukkuri paste-brained shitheads?

I think the problem is that they don't check the tag wiki at all, I seriously think we should put such explanations on a rule page or in the "how to comment" guide.

I did some work on the wiki pages for translated, translation available, translation request, check translation, and untranslated, in order to help clear up the problem some users have differentiating between other sites' usage of translation-related tags and OYP's.