We Seriously Need to Discuss it's properties since today I saw many pics tagged nicehead when they only have Yu's that as much could be considered average in the "good-bad" spectrum. Also a Wiki of it would be nice.
If I recall the previous conclusion about nicehead tag was that it has to be for a outstanding yukkuri that had proved it's good through self sacrifice, understanding or similar good aspects, but they have to be notorious and very positive. Still this doesn't mean that things like being "nice" to their families makes them nicehead by default, since scum yu's can also be nice to their peers while shits to everybody else. Basically a nicehead has to prove that niceness is for everything and even in the worse scenarios, and it has to do so with a outstanding good act or a bening speech.
Another thing we should define is if a nicehead tag should be determined per page or for the the whole work, like this case here:
First this Marisa is labelled nicehead because of this: post #32638
But then it stops being so after doing this: post #32673
In the example previously mentioned Marisa was tagged as nicehead because of it's "average" niceness in the beginning, yet as the story goes on we see her not being nicehead at all (not necessarily shithead of course.
And we know that usually "niceheads" don't do such things, even if broken, or at least the consesus seems to think like that. So It should be judged by the complete work's outcome and not single pages, but maybe someone disagrees and thinks that the nicehead of one page can stop being nicehead a few pages later.
We really need to define this, if not, nicehead will lose it's validity out of people tagging anything acting nice as a nicehead, without any strong proof of it's nicehead status.
Updated by yukiyuzen