No as a whole, many are quite well behaved like to know not to touch something they don't know what is for or who it belongs to. Plus maybe this is the first time the manjuus misbehaved? the anon sounds quite surprised about what they did. Also we don't know if the Bear was in a table, somehow fell and the yukkus took it for grantes.
Ah the many interpretations we could come with, but at the end it all resumes to "They screwed up and got punished for that".
I think the "mechanical pencil" tag is really unnecessary. There's no need to tag every little thing that is found in an image; additionally, you have to keep the context of the website in mind.
There should be one tag for every time a sharp, thin object is used to torture them, whether that be a pin, a tack, a mechanical pencil, a non-mechanical pencil, etc. The "pin" tag already has 12 pages, so just use "pin" every time something similar is used to torture them.
The reason for this is not to be a pain, but to make this site more streamlined as well as to make things easier to locate. If someone wanted to find images of them being tortured with something pointy it would be inefficient to have to search for all manner of things that could be used. Instead, there is just one simple tag that binds them all.
Please keep this methodology in mind when tagging in the future.
If my girl next door had given me a gift, and such a thing had happened, and I would have done much worse with them, right .. But in conclusion, abuse was deserved, justice was done.
Anyway, teddy bear ears are easier to rip than what people give credit to.
Besides if everything fails, all that remains is the usual case of "the world and reality plotting on their screw up, because of their anti world and reality nature".
I love how it's always "the yukkuri did something bad, it deserved to die", regardless of what it did. Yeah, I can understand that it did something bad, but really? Do you NEED to kill it/stab it? From the looks of it, they are kos which would mean they most likely wouldn't know any better. If a kitten rips up the toilet paper or a towel, do you cut it's paws off? If a baby knocks a glass over and it breaks, to you stab it repeatedly? No, of course not. You teach it it did something wrong and hopefully it learns.
But look who I'm talking to. As long as the little creature get's tortured, everything's good, right?
Hmm DoubleT, mind showing links of those cases? since poweryoga, while not being perfect and sometimes missing a few, usually cleans them up, besides the abuse side had been respecting the rule quite well lately. So it's hard to believe your "abuse comments on non abuse comments all the time" unless you mean the "No Violent" works, which aren't the same as Family Friendly.
The Rule Clearly states "No Abuse Comment on Family Friendly" and "No Anti Abuse Comment on Abuse", Non Violent usually is fair game since non violent =/= family friendly. basically non violent just doesn't have apparent violence on it, but doesn't mean it's the same tier of family friendly.
Also avoid the whole "yukkuri = kitten/baby/etc." comparison, the yukkuris are their own class of creature, and can't be judged in the same way than other creatures, same way you can't judge an animal the same way you judge a human, and so on.
I think that you should check Hourai's story recommendation list to get into the fandom to understand better yukkuris nature, to see why some people react the way they react, and then come out with your own conclusion. Since yukkuris aren't neither saints demonized by biased haters or demons overglorified by blind lovers.
Off hand, I don't have any examples to prove what I'm saying. Every now and again, when I'm browsing, I'll come across something like it but that's about it.
As for the "yukkuri = baby/kitten/etc." thing, that came from me initially connecting yukkuri to a rabbit like creature when I first saw them. High reproduction rate and can be a nuisance sometimes. Can be used as food but can be kept as pets.
I've known about yukkuris for a while so I understand were some people are coming from. Just can't wrap my head around why some people have the "they should all die" notion in their head.
I'll just leave it at that and shut up. I'm breaking the rules as is so let's just leave it "everyone has their own tastes". Or something like that.
@DoubleT I still think you are mistaking comments on Non Violent with comments on Family Friendly, since people are quite respectful in general of the FF works here, only very few seem to really have a real beef with FF, yeah even between the abuse fans.
And like Matt said, if you really want to discuss yukkuris, the fanfic group would be a good place as well. I could go and explain you some scenarios or attitudes of the very yukkuris that justify in general people's dislike, out of simplistic and absolutistic nature gone wrong. But it would be better to leave such explanations for the group, so if you really want to hear our takes on it, give us a call there by making a thread about it.
If you see abuse comments on family_friendly images, let me know one way or another and I'll clean it up. Abuse comments in non_violent is ok, since non_violent often has other elements that make the picture non family_friendly, though often non_violent gets family_friendly tags missing.
@DoubleT Those are anceint examples from the time on which neither the rule was up and neither poweryoga was a mod back then, if i recall correctly, so it's just poweryoga missing some really darn old stuff, something plausible considering we have thousands of pics here and he's the only mod around.
So abuse comments on family friendly pics don't happen all the time now, back then, before poweryoga and the rule, it did, same for anti abuse comments on abuse works. Now a days anti abuse on abuse, because of outside trolls, happen more often, than abuse comments on family friendly.