I think so. As I understood it, Marisa complained that she did not like to follow rules but still wanted to be a pet yukkuri, Miss retorted that those rules were for her own good.
ukshadow said: I think so. As I understood it, Marisa complained that she did not like to follow rules but still wanted to be a pet yukkuri, Miss retorted that those rules were for her own good.
This is a different Marisa. This and several another mini series by this artist seem to involve the same fem_anon and/or her friends in one way or another.
Salem, thank you very much for translating this pool and several others. You been a big help to this site. My only question is will you go back and place notes on those images you already translated via comments?
This story was interesting, I really like how Imprezza explains everything and only goes violent when the shits remain stubborn and attack or go on pestering her.
JusticeItEasy said: This story was interesting, I really like how Imprezza explains everything and only goes violent when the shits remain stubborn and attack or go on pestering her.
Eh, most (non-abuser/torturer) Anons would probably act the same way. Most rules have the badge system operating similar to a registry system so randomly dumping your "it broke the rules so now I don't want it anymore" pet yukkuri is a quick way to getting a fine for illegally abandoning your pet.
The violent/execution act that follows is probably just a cover up for "accidental" deaths. ("Why no, I didn't kill my pet yukkuri! It was stomped to death by stray yukkuris! Thats why the corpse is smashed and in the garbage bin!")
From the stories I had read and the overall impression of the yukkuri world, "disposing" of the gone rogue pet is seen as acceptable as a way to not break the law of "no yu pet dumping" and as an alternative to calling yu control who probably would do the same unless the owner is lying and the yu's are fine.
If I recall correctly, the rule of "no pet yu dumping" was stablished as a way to fight the increase of Stray Population by taking away a huge source of them, the rejected pets. The Badge system only works as a way to determinate ownership and yukkuri tier, but it doesn't necessarily give the yu themselves rights to the point of owners being fined or put in trial for disposing of a rule breaking pet.
JusticeItEasy said: From the stories I had read and the overall impression of the yukkuri world, "disposing" of the gone rogue pet is seen as acceptable as a way to not break the law of "no yu pet dumping" and as an alternative to calling yu control who probably would do the same unless the owner is lying and the yu's are fine.
If I recall correctly, the rule of "no pet yu dumping" was stablished as a way to fight the increase of Stray Population by taking away a huge source of them, the rejected pets. The Badge system only works as a way to determinate ownership and yukkuri tier, but it doesn't necessarily give the yu themselves rights to the point of owners being fined or put in trial for disposing of a rule breaking pet.
Congratulations. In your canon, you've legitimized animal cruelty and made it fully accepted by society. I look forward to reading stories about people torturing random yukkuris on the street while a crowd of onlookers cheer on because its perfectly legal and acceptable in the eyes of the public.
You're implying that doesn't happen already in many of the abyuse works and that it's my canon when in my canon things would work different.
Besides I wouldn't say it legitimize animal cruelty but yukkuri cruelty, It may not sound different but that's how the yukkuri world seems to roll, like, outside of yukkuris, everything is the same than our modern setting, if anything only the stuff related to yukkuris are over the top and unrealistic, like some sort of isolated social/cultural bubble in a bigger society.
But Again in My canon, things would be different, more organized, with proper laws, and only shitheads and scum getting the low end of the stick, even between pets, making rulebreaking not as bad end as in the pics we see here, unless shithead or scum.
Yukkuri cruelty is pretty much already legal and accepted to various degrees. Not animal cruelty, as to me it seems that inside stories people generally don't think of them or treat them as proper animals. Plenty of works you do see yukkuris, including the high class pet ones, being beat down or abandoned right on the street without much regard or regret- says to me in my 'canon' of things there isn't really much against that, or consequences. To me it's always seemed that pet yukkuris are rather more like property, as opposed to beings. Although abandoning them probably should carry a penalty, not because of the yukkuri themselves, but because of the trouble it would cause- clean up for the garbage men, more strays, etc.