Actually, looking at this, is this really kiri-sui's work? The style seems similar, but a bit different compared to say post #13754. Maybe it's just an early work.
I'd say it is. The style is quite similar save for one or two things to other works by him. There's other artists on here that have had similar development over time- the most prominent example being nagekiaki. You can see with other artists such as Rorinko that they do more "developed" pictures, and more sketchy things as well.
I'm coming a bit late to this one... but does this really count as "Danger"? The other yukkuris are freaking out, but there's no real sign he wants to hurt the baby in any way -- and he's even paying the other yukkuris for it. He may just want a pet, and either doesn't care about the other yukkuris, or figures this is a fair trade.
at first i think too that anon gonna press coin on koreimu. that is where danger and coin_abuse tag came. even if anon is dangerous but danger is not in this picture. but it will happen in future.we just need to tag picture not future
If you pay attention to any of the other pictures here, you'd probably notice that anon is practically always accompanied by danger. That, and the fact that the older yukkuris are screaming in terror.
It doesn't matter how many anon involve danger or violence. the matter is this image not static. the story is anon buy koreimu from family and family don't understand. Is it danger.If you will buy a car and your mother fear that you will have accident.are you in danger?
If you look through the anon tag the vast majority involves yukkuri abuse or impending harm. But what we really need to focus on here are two things:
1) The artist's history and tendencies and implied intent.
2) The reactions of the other yukkuris, especially the mother.
Because a mother has jurisdiction and responsibility over her child, if she feels the child is in danger then, for all intents and purposes, it is in danger. If a stranger tries to or succeeds in taking your child then, regardless of the stranger's intent, there is danger present. Are we understood?
A definition for danger is: "an instance or cause of peril"
Peril: "exposure to injury, loss, or destruction"
Key word there is "loss." Danger does not necessarily mean something is capable of causing physical harm or death. If something causes a mother to lose her child against her will then it is dangerous.
It's folly to tag a picture according to what happens later or what you think will happen later. If there is a continuation to this and the man buying the child turns out to be a warm, kindhearted person that still doesn't change the fact that danger is present here. And that still doesn't change the fact that he essentially robbed the child. Also remember that danger can be subjective. You may see something as harmless but if the mother feels it's dangerous for her child then she has the right to consider it dangerous and take measures.
If an element is present in the picture it should be tagged even if it is not present in all of the characters, you included. You don't think it's dangerous. The child doesn't think it's dangerous. But the mother thinks it's dangerous so there is danger here.
Analogy: Let's say a picture has a character with arachnophobia along with a spider. The character is afraid, so you tag the picture with "fear." You are not afraid and do not see anything worth fearing. The spider is not afraid. But the character is afraid and so that is enough to justify a "fear" tag.
>>Is it danger.If you will buy a car and your mother fear that you will have accident.are you in danger?
Guess what? You are in danger when you're driving and your mother is absolutely right. She may be overreacting and reluctant to allow her child to leave the nest but that doesn't change the fact that there is always danger present when driving.
- You making a mistake - Other drivers making mistakes - Drunk/ high/ preoccupied( cellphone, makeup, food, etc) drivers - Bad road and weather conditions - Something running out onto the road - Car malfunctions - Ambulance or police chase
I don't think adding new tags to describe an image in greater detail would be a bad idea. You may counter by saying that we don't need to go that in-depth but consider this: we are not an all-encompassing site like the others. We specialize in yukkuris so it would only make sense that we categorize yukkuris by their moods and feelings since we're "All yukkuris, all the time."
We already have tags like "singing" and "begging" which describe actions so emotions wouldn't be that far-fetched.
I think they're fine as long as we don't start removing the established ones in place. Although there's a not very useful glitch in the system which means after a certain number of tags only the first few display...
Also I agree with the danger tag here. Kiriraitaa's mother yukkuris are typically more aware of danger and become terrified while his koyukkuris are naive. Another point. If anon thinks 100 yen is worth the life of a yukkuri, he doesn't value yukkuris at all.