yet it wouldn't be for those who don't like them and stuff, pluss it doesn't seem to be a work mean for that kind of people, so dunno why you are putting such tags.
There isn't some sort of tag for "food yukkuri" that isn't livestock right? i mean, livestock is usually for farm like scenarios, but this is clearly a restaurant
Rorinko's art style makes aches my heart sometimes to watch yukkuris get killed. This one is especially paining for some reason. Maybe I should go look at family friendly pics from Rorinko. Or other yukkuri torture that satisfies me instead of paining me.
Justice: There isn't, so the livestock tag has been appropiated for it. Of course, if a mass re-tagging feature becomes available I'll shift them to something more suitable.
There's already the "abuse" tag, so the people who don't like yukkuri abuse can stay away from it by using the '-abuse' search. Looking at images that satisfy us rather than paining us is a lot more logical and we'd all probably get along better.
Although, looking at the abuse tag it's currently described as being a type of violence. Seems a bit unnecessary; perhaps it could be better used now on images that are yukkuri abuse in general. Then it'll be easier to filter through material: family friendly and the abuse.
"The people who don't like yukkuri abuse can stay away from it. Looking at images that satisfy us rather than paining us is a lot more logical"
Are you talking about me there? I like seeing yukkuri abuse all right. It's just that I sometimes chance upon seeing something I wish I hadn't, and I can't control that with the tags.
Just what you normally would search for and add "-abuse" at the end, without quatation marks. So something like "Rorinko Reimu -abuse" without quotes into search box. But not many pictures actually have abuse tag, Danger or Death might be better tag to filter away, so "Rorinko Reimu -danger -death"
Oh, I see. I was trying to type in just '-abuse'. Thanks for the help. And thanks for the tip too. Since I prefer to have yukkuris alive (to take the abuse, normally) doing without death tag will help.
No, it's more of a general point. Because really, regardless of tags if you do come to something you wish you hadn't, just back up and walk away rather than doting on it. You can tell by looking at the thumbnails that come up during a search, and if it seems off pass it by and head to the next one that looks good.
There's more specific tags now as well, so you can filter out specific types of abuse. An example would be "rorinko -severed -eye_loss'.
How is having a Immobilized mother forced to contentiously give birth only to watch her babies get eaten right in front of her on a regular basis not nightmare fuel?
That isn't scary for us, not for her, remember, nightmare_fuel is always for the audience not for us, and nightmare fuel is usually something that regardless of your abuse or family friendly preference, you may find it seriously scary.
This isn't scary for the audience and even less in a general way so, nope, no nightmare fuel.
Should just stop creating new tags if there's only going to be one or two pictures that you would use it for. Use already existing tag, it's already cluttered to hell as it is. Personally, I feel this would fall under the category of livestock and leave it at that. I mean, if you see "livestock" it's kind of assumed they're going to be eaten in some way or the other.
We've established that this isn't nightmare fuel and that creating tags such as 'upsetting' or 'disturbing' is unnecessary and they're nothing that can't be found or avoided using pre-existing tags. We're pretty much done here.
Funny who the fuck do you think is the one who actually labeled stories that had no names so that they could be more organized. Hm was that you I think not who spent a great deal of time going back and adding translation available to old stuff so It could be found more easily. Funny I don't see you doing any of that so perhaps you better close your goddamn mouth and try doing it your self before you get the right to criticize me about mislabeling stuff.
And tea don't even get me started on the bullshit you've done with family friendly stuff.
>>who spent a great deal of time going back and adding translation available to old stuff
That was me, by the way. A lot of the old pictures don't have correct untranslated/translation_available tags, and some of the newer uploads also. A kind reminder to the uploaders and translators to remember those.
blah blah blah. Coker, All the stuff i had seen you do usually are mistagged at some point, because of your preferences. I don't do much tagging myself since i'm not confident enough that i'm 100% aware of the meaning of each tag, as much i from time to time do a massive copy paste from originals to translated and make sure to remplace "untraslated" with "translated".
I had also from time to time bumped old comics worth of translation for the sake of someone to notice them.
I'm not the super mod tier active member or anything, but i do help a bit sometimes, and i try to not let bias to make something i personally feel sad or anger inducing not be labelled as such if it's mainly an opinion and not something that the general consensus share.
Better be active a bit in a averagely good way than being super active in a disastrous way like you.
Not sure who you're talking to, because I do go back from time to time to retag old content as well as work on new content and translations. You've been mistagging shit for the past 2 months with too many examples to count. If you want to contribute with tagging, learn the proper usage by looking through examples and don't get defensive when people point you out. Not that hard.
I'd much rather you just comment rather than be active in a destructive way by mistagging a bunch of old pictures.
Is Disastrous because it's biased, you consider your preference over the general consensus, that's disastrous, remember, that's part of a proper community, while doing something for the sake of it, not impose our preferences, just what it needs.
Adding tags like upsetting, sad, etc. to abuse stories that are meant to be pure abuse, not even serious dramas, really brings problems, tagging something nightmare_fuel because of the character's "possible" impression instead of what the audience feels about it is also troublesome.
Again, i'll ask you politely this time, think of the community first while doing that, your preferences are only for comments, not for tagging.
@Coker >> You've been mistagging shit for the past 2 months with too many examples to count. = Disastrous. >> I'd much rather you just comment rather than be active in a destructive way by mistagging a bunch of old pictures. = Stop tagging.
It's bullshit when it isn't true, since it's true it isn't bullshit, you know that when you are fine i don't get in your case, you're always in the Horizon of "respectable member" or "annoying disrupter".
Don't get on my case if i biasedly take away the cute tags of all "cute" pics with moeblobs because i think that moeblobs nullify the cuteness or i'll puff you! WAIT NEVER MIND I'LL PUFF YOU ANYWAY FUCKERS! *PUUUUUUFFFFFFFF*