anon0014 said:
I know this isn't danbooru, but come on...
Not that I have any say in it, but if the admins don't have any problem with it, I don't see why it should be an issue.
Posted under General
anon0014 said:
I know this isn't danbooru, but come on...
Not that I have any say in it, but if the admins don't have any problem with it, I don't see why it should be an issue.
Do you mind that I changed shanghai/hourai_(character) to Shanghai/hourai_doll? The doll name was a bit more accurate.
Gourry said:
Um, some of those are the yukkuri versions of shanghai/hourai. Also got it.
Just pointing out if they are properly tagged, that's all. A lot of them still needs to be checked for proper tagging.
Updated
I found out the artist's name for artist___tennkoma and artist___sunakoshi is sunakoishi_ten. Shall I change the tags? Also how do we mass edit tags?
Only admins have mass edit priviledge. I'll change that artist.
edit:
Edited the shanghai tag to shanghai_doll. Unfortunately there's no way to identify the difference between the 2 tags so we'll have to find the yukkuri versions and tag them with shanghai.
Updated
My request isn't for a specific tag, but for the taggers to PLEASE CHECK FOR THE PROPER SPELLING while tagging. When in doubt, use an existing tag instead.
For example, it's "tongue", not "tounge". Also, "yukkuri", not "yukurri".
(Reposting this until everyone gets it.)
psychological_abuse tag:
When a yukkuri is subjected to treatment calculated to engender fear, stress, pain, etc in a yukkuri without the use of direct physical violence. The subject yukkuri(s) credulity, short memory, liminal thought processes, inbuilt altruistic instincts (such as compassion for fellow yukkuris) and certain inbuilt involuntary reactions to stimuli are exploited.
Examples:
post #31617
post #31432
Updated
amicustribusyu said:
psychological_abuse tag
You forgot to mention arrogance, stupidity, short sightness, stubborness, selfishness and other things similar bad yu aspects that can be exploited as well for psychological abuse.
amicustribusyu said:
psychological_abuse tag:
Seeing as most taggers don't know Japanese, I don't see this going over very well.
toy versus toys: I don't think we need both of these tags, but they seem to have roughly equal use. Can we make "toy" the official one and stop using "toys" (or vice-versa)?
Seeing as most taggers don't know Japanese, I don't see this going over very well.
So the tag can be added after someone posts a translation/summary. Weren't people specifically asking for a psychological abuse tag somewhere around here?
platina said:
So the tag can be added after someone posts a translation/summary. Weren't people specifically asking for a psychological abuse tag somewhere around here?
Except our discussion is meaningless since amicustribusyu went ahead and started using the tag already. (post #31926 is psychological_abuse???)
Anyway, JIE's point still stands. If you take into account typical yukkuri "arrogance, stupidity, short sightness, stubborness, selfishness and other things similar", you can argue that anything is 'psychological abuse.' amicustribusyu's definition just makes things worse.
"The subject yukkuri(s) [...] liminal thought processes, [...] are exploited."
Gee, thats EVERYTHING. Saying "Take it easy!" to cause them to freeze? Thats psychological abuse under his definition.
amicustribusyu said:
- A wound involves breaking the skin and results in the leaking of anko.
- An injury involves any damage regardless.
Both of them involve yukkuris being hurt. The difference is miniscule and hardly worthy of being made.
starshine said:
Both of them involve yukkuris being hurt. The difference is miniscule and hardly worthy of being made.
I think that it is. An injury can be purely internal, while a wound implies something external, typically involving the expression of anko (the yukkuri equivalent of bleeding).
amicustribusyu said:
I think that it is. An injury can be purely internal, while a wound implies something external, typically involving the expression of anko (the yukkuri equivalent of bleeding).
Internal wounds are not perceivable. Tagging things that can't be seen is impossible.
yukiyuzen said:
Internal wounds are not perceivable. Tagging things that can't be seen is impossible.
What I meant by internal was not breaking the skin. A bruise is an injury but not a would.